data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe4bc/fe4bcb66e70666a9506b6aa587e71f024b5c9914" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9cf18/9cf1859ed882a67d9ed689272bd3d36fd9d2653e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/760f8/760f81300716a3ca9ebc1e25e9f750d0506f38c1" alt=""
Reusing the old shed
This was a definite plus. We reused the cedar siding, framing lumber, foundation beams, hardware and pier blocks. Here in Oregon, we could have recycled all this material - but it was much better and cheaper to use it again.
We did not reuse
- 1x4 flooring - tried but it was too damaged (100's of nails!)
- Cedar shingle roofing - too much moss and mold
- Windows - they were tiny and of poor quality
- Plastic and tar paper - too old and damaged
We also used up a bunch of old paint stored in the shed for primer, which worked well.
When I was grinding the nail heads to get the pier blocks free, I got a piece of metal lodged in my eye - and I need to get an incision to get it out (ouch). I had on safety glasses, but it made it's way up underneath. I'll wear a face shield in the future.
Shed sizing
The shed size is key to using materials well. The 12 x 16 footprints gave the following advantages:
- Used full sheets of plywood for the floor
- Had very little waste in framing the walls. - The 7' height gave us a bunch of 1' pieces, which we used for shelf support blocks.
- The 12' width allowed for 8' rafters on a 4/12 pitch, which was by far the most economical
Sliding door
It was more expensive than a hinged double door - about $100 extra - but I think it was well worth it. It is much easier to use, and stays right were you put it.
Summary
I think the shed build was a good intermediate project, that most DIY people could handle with the right tools and time.
No comments:
Post a Comment